|
|
Ralph Preszler Assistant Professor of Biology Research Emphasis: Biology Education
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Office Phone: (505) 646-5346 Mailing Address: Office Location: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary goal of my research is to develop educational theory
and practice which aims to help students reach higher levels of biological
literacy. Such literacy is characterized by the ability to critically
access, evaluate, synthesize, and apply biological knowledge to personal,
academic, and professional issues. This has led to projects involved in
the design and assessment of educational reform in three areas: 1)
university-level biology lecture courses, 2) university-level teaching
laboratories, and Lecture Courses My current work is primarily focused on applying scientific rigor to the evaluation of educational techniques. We have experimentally evaluated the effectiveness of using student-response systems (clickers) to enhance student learning in our biology courses (Preszler et al., 2007). I also have conducted experiments evaluating the effectiveness of cooperative-learning activities which supplement large lecture courses (Preszler 2006, 2004). We are in the processing of assessing the use of peer-led workshops, case studies, and integrated-content modules in our biology courses.
We are currently attempting to improve student learning in biology courses by modifying the structure of the courses and teaching techniques used in them. We are using a variety of assessment tools to determine the effectiveness of these course reforms. With support of a grant from Howard Hughes Medical Institute, we have introduced a major renovation of our introductory biology courses. Starting in Spring 2007, one of the three lectures each week will be replaced by an hour and fifteen minute peer-facilitated workshop. The purpose of the workshops is to provide students with the opportunity to work in small supervised groups on lecture-based content and complementary data generated in the laboratories. The workshops will provide students with the opportunity to develop learning- and critical-thinking skills ranging from simple study techniques to the ability to solve and interpret biological problems. We also are revising the organization and presentation of topics. We will be presenting the course content in the form of integrated content modules, rather than surveys of hierarchies of biological concepts. For example, our traditional approach to Biology 111 was to sequentially work through cell division and genetics, evolution, diversity, and ecology. In the new course structure, we will begin by introducing the problem of evolution of drug resistant bacteria. In order to better understand this problem students will need to know a bit of diversity (what are bacteria?), genetics (but not the added complexity of eukaryotic patterns of inheritance), natural selection and evolution, and population growth. Notice that a bit of each traditional content area is drawn in on a need to know basis. The second module introduces a few more concepts from each major content area as they are needed to develop an understanding of a problem. The purpose of this approach is to present biology as a problem-solving and knowledge-generating process, rather than as a collection of accumulated knowledge. Case studies will be used as explicit problem-solving examples that will help tie together lecture, laboratory, and workshops. As with the larger integrated-content modules, the case studies are designed to help students better understand the relevance of biological content in relation to generating new knowledge, solving applied problems, and exploring societal issues. Biology Teaching Laboratories
Science Educational Outreach to K-12 Students
Graduate Students There are opportunities for graduate students to obtain and M.S. or Ph.D. in our Department of Biology as they conduct research on the development and assessment of the theory and practice of science education.
Recent Presentations Preszler, R.W., A. Dawe, C. Shuster, and M. Shuster (2006). Engaging each student in large
lectures with wireless student response units. Annual Conference of the
National Association of Biology Teachers, Marion, A., R. W. Preszler, and M. Shuster (2006). Teaching scientific process in
an introductory biology course. Annual Conference of the National
Association of Biology Teachers, Santisteban, M.E.., and R. W. Preszler. (2006). Effectiveness of an environmental education
outreach program: Audubon adventures in Preszler, R.W. (2006).
Using controlled experiments to assess components of supplemental
instruction. Fourth International Conference on Supplemental
Instruction, Preszler, R.W. (2005). Personal behavior and partner’s sexual history: a simulation of the spread of HIV. 27th workshop/conference of the association for biology laboratory education (ABLE). Cook, B. and R.W. Preszler. (2005). Evaluation of the schoolyard desert discovery program. National Science Teachers Association’s Annual Conference. Preszler, R.W. (2005).
Improving Student’s Performance in a Challenging Biology Course:
Assessing Specific Components of Supplemental Instruction. Science,
Engineering, and Technology Education Conference, Preszler, R. W. and A. L. Marion. (2004). Service-learning Activities in Biology
Laboratories: bridging the gap from knowledge to action. The 22nd
Annual Conference of the Association for
Biology Laboratory Education. Marion, A. L., and R. W. Preszler.
(2004). Concept mapping as a learning strategy
in introductory biology laboratories. The 22nd Annual Conference
of the Association for Biology Laboratory
Education. Preszler, R.W. 2004.
Helping students discover the implications of biology laboratory
investigations. Science, Engineering, and Technology Education
Conference,
Recent Publications Preszler, R.W., A. Dawe, C. Shuster, and M. Shuster (2007). Clickers: assessing their effects on student attitudes and student learning in biology lectures. Cell biology education: life sciences education. 6(1): 29-41. Preszler, R.W. 2006. Student- and teacher-centered learning in biology workshops. Bioscene: Journal of College Biology Teaching 32:21-25. Preszler, R.W. (2006). Personal behavior and partner’s sexual history: a simulation of the spread of HIV. in Tested studies for laboratory Teaching, Volume 27, (M. O’Donnell, Editor). Proceedings of the 27th workshop/conference of the association for biology laboratory education (ABLE). Preszler, R.W. (2005). Combining inquiry- and service-learning activities. in Tested studies for laboratory Teaching, Volume 26, (M. O’Donnell, Editor). Proceedings of the 26th workshop/conference of the association for biology laboratory education (ABLE). Preszler, R.W., L.L. Haas, and
A.L. Marion. 2005. Cellular and organismal biology:
student investigations, 7th-5th Edition Outernet Publishing, Preszler, R. W. 2004. Cooperative concept mapping improves performance in biology. Journal of College Science Teaching 33: 30-35. Preszler, R.W. 2004. Expanding the nature of science in teaching laboratories: from ethology to investigating animal behavior. in Tested studies for laboratory Teaching, Volume 25, (S. Karcher, Editor). Proceedings of the 25th workshop/conference of the association for biology laboratory education (ABLE).
I teach the following
courses: Natural Sciences 121, which introduces elementary educations majors to science with an emphasis on the life sciences. Biology 301, Ecology, provides students at the Junior level a survey of the theory and practice of ecology. Biology 467, Evolution This senior course explores the study of evolution. Biology 550, The Theory and Practice of Science Education This graduate course reviews the primary literature of science education and provides students theoretical and practical support in their efforts to teach science to university students.
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|