Science, Ethics & Society
03/27/03

Term Paper

Sources and description  Feb 5 50 points
Draft  Mar 12  75 points 
Final Version  Revisions  Instructions  Assembly
Apr 23  125 points
Oral presentation Apr 30  50 points
Examples: Fall 2000 



 
OVERVIEW
(Total: 300 points, earned in 4 parts as described below.)

You will be required to prepare a 10-15 page, typed, double-spaced, essay on a science ethics topic that you will chose from several themes suggested by the instructor. The term paper must draw on sources available in our library or through interlibrary loan, and from the optional class readings. The paper must address a clearly identifiable and defined ethical issue, and should present opposing arguments, that is, arguments on both sides of the debate.It should conclude with a statement of your ethical views regarding the topic and the rationale for your thinking.Precise details of formatting and guidelines for the contents, etc. will be handed out at a later date.

Theme- Select your term paper topic from here 

PART 1: SOURCES AND DESCRIPTION 

Due date: Feb 5  (50 points)

SOURCES (25 points)  : As part of the term paper, you will be required to prepare an annotated bibliography on the subject of the term paper that will include at least 5 books or journal articles available in our library.  On Feb 5, hand in a preliminary list of at least 10 of your sources with a brief description of each.  If few sources are available in the NMSU library, identify potential books or journals in this topic area that are available through interlibrary loan. Off campus sources should be requested by the Feb 5 date! Web sites may be added to your sources but a copy of the printout of the home page for the site must be included with the final bibliography in your term paper.
These links provide information about preparing an annotated bibliography 
http://www.crk.umn.edu/library/links/annotate.htm
http://www.library.cornell.edu/okuref/research/skill28.htm

DESCRIPTION (25 points) : Prepare a brief, 1-2 page typed, double spaced description of your paper and define the ethical theme you will address. The instructor will use this to give you guidance for the final content of the term paper. 

PART 2: TERM PAPER & BIBLIOGRAPHY DRAFT

   Due date: Mar 12 (75 points)
As part of your writing efforts for this class, you will be asked to rewrite and refine your paper.On MAR 12, You should hand in the first draft of your term paper.Your paper will be critiqued and returned after spring break, in time for you to refine and rewrite the paper. 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR DRAFT OF TERM PAPER:
 

  • The term paper is a 10-15 page double spaced TYPED essay on a science ethics topic of your choice (to be approved by the instructor). The term paper must draw on sources available in our library or through interlibrary loan.
  • The term paper must have a TITLE PAGE that includes THE LAST 4 DIGITS OF YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, date submitted, course number.
  • The term paper should include a one page double spaced ABSTRACT that is no longer than 300 words.
  • The paper must address a CLEARLY ARTICULATED ETHICAL ISSUE AS AN ARGUMENT ESSAY 
  • The paper must present OPPOSING ARGUMENTS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DEBATE 
  • It should conclude with a STATEMENT of your ethical views regarding the topic, and the rationale for your thinking.
  • The annotated bibliography references must be part of the formal paper discussion.
  • GRADING  75 Points will be earned as follows:
  • Following instructions (20 points)
  • were the references reviewed?
  • was it typed, double spaced, with one inch margins?
  • did you present opposing viewpoints?
  • did you provide the concluding personal statement as requested?
  • were there at least 10 references widely distributed with respect to source type (books, websites and articles) and chronology (recent -last 10 years- and older sources)
  • Clarity of writing (10 points)
  • was the ethical controversy under review clear?
  • were the paragraphs well organized, in a logical sequence?
  • was it easy to understand what the refs were about?
  • Grammar (10 points)
  • was the spelling corrected? spellcheck can only help a little.
  • for example, spellcheck programs will accept there and their as correct, BUT only one of these will be appropriate in most sentences!
  • were the sentences complete, each with a noun and verb?
  • Scholarship (35 points)
  • what was the overall quality of the document? my judgement call!!!
  • how well did you integrate the different references?
  • was the significance of the papers (or lack of!) made clear to the reader?
  • was there a balanced presentation of multiple viewpoints?
  • PART 3: TERM PAPER REWRITE & BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Due date: Apr 23 (125 points)

    REVISIONS

    Most if not all of the following critiques applied to all the draft versions:

    • use page numbers!
    • cite references. 
      • statements presented as "fact" need supporting documentation. 
      • many statements should cite more than one reference. 
      • all references must be cited in your paper
      • see below on how to format references
      • the easiset way to cite is as (author, year) for multiple authors (first author et al., year)
      • chapters in books need to be cited using the chapter author, year, title and then the book and editors included at the end
    • add more detail, tables, figures, ie DATA.  there is science in all the papers and it should be presented in quantitative format
    • use subheadings 
    • separate intro, background, pros, cons, personal statement (this should be 1.5-2 pages long)
    • use italics to highlight quotes
    • streamline and refine your writing style
    • make sure the ethical dilemma is clear
    • it is recommended that you ask at least 2 other people read your paper
    • FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS BELOW CAREFULLY AS NEW CATEGORIES HAVE BEEN ADDED
    INSTRUCTIONS FOR FINAL VERSION  OF TERM PAPER::
     
  • The term paper should be prepared as a double spaced TYPED essay with ONE INCH MARGINS on a science ethics topic of your choice (to be approved by the instructor).
  • The term paper should have NUMBERED PAGES beginning with the Abstract page.  THE LAST 4 DIGITS OF YOUR SSN should appear on the upper right hand side of every page in the header section.
  • The paper must address a CLEARLY ARTICULATED ETHICAL ISSUE OR THEME.
  • The paper must present OPPOSING ARGUMENTS ON BOTH SIDES OF A DEBATE
  • The term paper must draw on REFERENCES available in our library or through interlibrary loan, as well as websites and other apropriate sources.
  • Your FORMAL DISCUSSION should incorporate REFERENCES and these should be cited.   Your references may be the same as your annotated biblioraphy OR they may be a reduced set of these.  However, you should should cite a minimum of EIGHT references from your annotated bibliography in the main essay.
  • Citations can be used for direct quotes AND for strong major statements in your paper that are based on published data or articles.  For example the statement "Genetic testing is perceived as a valuable tool in the fight against disease" can be followed by a citation for a publication that advocates genetic testing.  The statement "Weight gain and depression are side effects of depo-provera."  would also be followed by a citation.

  • ASSEMBLY OF CONTENTS:

    The term paper must BE ASSEMBLED AND SUBMITTED with the following items, organized in the order listed below.

  • TITLE PAGE: The first page should contain the title,  your name, date submitted, course number.
  • ABSTRACT:  The term paper abstract should be no more than 250 words (note reduced word count).  It is recommended that you revise your abstract when you complete the final version of your term paper.
  • PREFACE (NEW ENTRY):  Prepare a 2 page preface that summarizes your efforts preparing the term paper.  Explain how you selected your topic and references and how your paper evolved through the various assinments and revisions.  Describe difficulties encountered, lessons learned, and areas where more guidance would have been helpful.
  • MAIN ESSAY:  The main essay should be 10-15 pages in length and should include the following.
  • Incorporate comments received from the THE instructor.
  • Use subheadingssuch as: background, ethical dilemmas, historical perspectives, arguments by proponents, arguments by opponents, personal statement (required)
  • Separate pros and cons arguments in the narrative
  • In the final version of the paper, you must incorporate one or more of the ethical principles that are used in human subjects research (integrity, respect for persons, beneficence, justice) into the discussion of the ethical dimensions of your paper theme 
  • Personal statement.  In 1-2 pages describe your position and rationale.  In this statement describe which ethical philosophies discussed in class influencd your view or are pertinent to the theme under discussion.
  • REFERENCES:  List at least eight references to be cited in the paper as follows:
  • For data or sources, cite in parentheses as: (first author, year)
  • For quotes, cite in parentheses as: (first author, year, page number)
  • Web pages should be grouped and listed as http-1, http-2, etc., and include the date you accessed and downloaded the page.
  • Web pages should be cited as: (http-x, date downloaded)
  • ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY:  Include all the references and your critiques you submitted previously on Feb. 5 as well as any new references you used for your paper

  •  

     
     
     
     
     

    GRADING  125 Points can be earned as follows:

  • Following instructions (25 points)
  • were all components submitted?
  • were margins and formatting as requested?
  • did you present opposing viewpoints?
  • did you provide the concluding personal statement as requested?
  • did you provide the sources critique as requested?
  • did you provide the abstract and preface as requested?
  • were multiple references cited in the main essay as requested?
  • Clarity of writing (20 points)
  • was the ethical controversy under review clear?
  • were the paragraphs well organized, in a logical sequence?
  • was it easy to understand what the refs were about?
  • Grammar (20 points)
  • was the spelling corrected? spellcheck can only help a little, for example, spellcheck programs will accept there and their as correct, BUT only one of these will be appropriate in most sentences!
  • were the sentences complete, each with a noun and verb?
  • were there appropriate paragraph breaks?
  • Scholarship (60 points)
  • did you incorporate some suggestions from critiques of the first draft?
  • how well did you integrate the different references?
  • was the significance of the references (or lack of!) made clear to the reader?
  • was there a balanced presentation of multiple viewpoints?
  • was the term paper a coherent document?
  • what was the overall quality of the term paper? my judgement call!!!
  • Part 4: TERM PAPER ORAL PRESENTATION
    Due date: Apr 30, finals week  (50 Points)
    • You will prepare a 10 minute summary presentation for the class based on your term paper assignment.
    • The presentation will be timed and you will lose 5 points for every minute you exceed the alloted time so PRACTICE beforehand!
    • If you wish, I can upload your presentation to server.  Send me the VIRUS-FREE file by April 28.



     
    THEMES

    Use these themes to identify a subject area for your term paper. Your term paper should address an ethical dilemma in the theme area.  Other topics not on this list may be acceptable but should be cleared with the instructor.

          Access to medication in third world countries
          Biological patents
          Biological weapons development
          Biopiracy
          Chemical weapons development
          Chemical weapons: environmental decontamination
          DNA testing
          Drug testing in third world countries
          Drug testing on children
          Drugs and behavior modification
          Enforced sterilization of humans
          Eugenics and the human genome project
          Euthanasia
          Fertility research
          Fetal tissue research
          Genetic basis of behavior
          Genetic discrimination
          Genetic Testing
          Human and animal subjects research in developing countries
          Human cloning
          Human genome diversity project
          Human subject research on prisoners
          Human subject research on soldiers
          Human subject research on the poor
          Industry and academic conflicts of interest
          Informed consent
          Intellectual property
          International research: First world collection of third world specimens
          Medical technology and right-to-die
          Misconduct and whistle-blowing
          Natural resource management
          Plant and animal sample collection
          Plant Genetic Engineering
          Prozac and children
          Prozac and companion animals
          Repopulation of habitats with native species
          Ritalin and children
          Stem cell research
          Surveillance technology and personal privacy
          Use of primates in research
     


    Honors 306G  Fall 2000
    Examples: Student Term Papers and Titles


    Bill Kennedy Misconduct: Two Disciplines, too Much Power 
    Mayra Lopez Somatic Gene Therapy: Focus on Cystic Fibrosis
    Shannon Manuelito Non Human Primate Research
    Matt Marple Ethical dilemmas regarding the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical  weapons.
    Carlye Mascorro Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide:
    Whose life is it, anyway?
    Jason McKinney Freedom Genes
    Allyson Richards To medicate or not to medicate, that is the question
    Marijo Wienkers Prozac, is it the miracle drug for kids?
    Ellen Zwank Who Should Own Your Genes?